Problem viewing this email? Click here for online version.
 

Tips, Links and Tidbits Newsletter

because

Logo
Twitter Facebook Google
 
 
 
Read or Condemn Yourself to Death by Ignorance

For those courageous souls brave enough to look and see what is,

who are unwilling to blindly accept

the lies and rules of tyrannical authority.

The simple step of a courageous individual is not to take part in the lie.

One word of truth outweighs a world of lies.


Observation And Integrity

Wednesday 10th February 2021


G’day,

Hope this finds you fit and well.

Here is a sampling of what recently crossed my digital desk.

Food Shortages Coming

20-year-old filmmaker wins award for powerful 1-minute film about marriage

Intellectual Bravery

New Variant

Face Mask In Pool

If The Government Would Feed Radioactive Oatmeal to Little Kids, What Wouldn’t They Do?

You Are Here

Start Where You Are

KGB 1960s Experiment

Why Arguing Does Not Work

Fall Seven Get Up Eight

How To Buy Influence

Do Your Best

Peruvian court rules that Bill Gates, George Soros and Rockefeller family “created” coronavirus pandemic

How nanotech is changing your world

I hope you get something from it!

Cheers!

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Food Shortages Coming
 
Food Shortages Coming
 
 
 

I have posted previously about the dystopian view the World Economic Forum has of the future. This is part of it. Have you seen the film Soylent Green? I haven’t yet. must make time for it.

 
 
 
 
20-year-old filmmaker wins award for powerful 1-minute film about marriage
 
Marriage Film
 
 
 

Amazing what can be conveyed in just 60 seconds.

You may not be able to understand their words, but the gestures and subtitles help to convey the beautiful message of this short award-winning film made by 20-year-old Iranian filmmaker Syed Mohammad Reza Kheradmand.

The film, called Thursday Appointment, recently won an award at the Luxor African Film Festival, a non-profit organization that encourages and celebrates film-making from Africa.

The powerful short movie depicts an older married couple reciting the Poem of Hafez to one another in the car, when they stop at a red light and notice a couple fighting loudly with their young daughter in the back seat. The older couple make a gesture that says a lot about their own marriage, and about how married love can help reconcile and restore others around us.

 
Button
 
 
 
Intellectual Bravery
 
New Idea Stocks
 
 
 

I was struck by this recent observation from Timothy Clark in his HBR article on cultivating “Intellectual Bravery”:

“Intellectual bravery is a willingness to disagree, dissent, or challenge the status quo in a setting of social risk in which you could be embarrassed, marginalized, or punished in some way. When intellectual bravery disappears, organizations develop patterns of willful blindness. Bureaucracy buries boldness. Efficiency crushes creativity. From there, the status quo calcifies and stagnation sets in.

“The responsibility for creating a culture of intellectual bravery lies in leadership. As a leader, you set the tone, create the vibe, and define the prevailing norms. Whether or not your company has a culture of intellectual bravery depends on your ability to establish a pattern of rewarded rather than punished vulnerability.”

You can tell a lot about an organization by what gets punished and what gets rewarded. Stanford professor Bob Sutton famously observed twenty years ago that many organizations follow an unspoken motto to “reward success and inaction, punish failure.”

He advised instead to “reward success and failure, punish inaction.”

 
Button
 
 
 
New Variant
 
New Variant
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
Face Mask In Pool
 
Face Mask In Pool
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
If The Government Would Feed Radioactive Oatmeal to Little Kids, What Wouldn’t They Do?
 
Radioactive Oatmeal Kids
 
 
 

It’s getting harder to focus on the “news”.

Considering that all media is filtered through just five megacorporations (compared with 50 companies in the early 80s), not to mention (but I will) the fact that domestic propaganda was officially “approved” for use against the American people a few years ago, it’s kinda hard to tell the difference between what is real and what isn’t anymore.

Besides, it’s all “hey look, shiny things”. Pay attention to the right hand so you won’t see what the left is doing.

The distractions on the “news” also serve another purpose. To fill up your short term memory up with junk food for the brain. To keep you from remembering what happened last week, let alone last year. From putting these things into perspective, especially historical perspective.

We’ve undertaken a large-scale research project. We’re six months in. I was reading “The Plutonium Files,” a book on the American government’s top secret medical experimentation against mostly unwitting, clueless American citizens during the Cold War. All of this stuff is on record, but many people still have no idea even half of this stuff ever happened.

And that’s how it is with a lot of government experimentation. There’s a decades-long history of it, stretching all the back to the stress tests that were done on soldiers in the first world war and really, who knows if it only started there. Doubtful.

Take the Tuskegee syphilis experiments, for example, where the government lied to about and knowingly failed to treat rural African American patients for the disease so prominent health officials who could care less about the Hippocratic Oath could see what would happen as the disease progressed (and spread). The experiment on patients who never gave informed consent and thought they were being treated for “bad blood” spanned 40 years and only ended in November 1972 because of a whistleblower. Penicillin was validated as a cure in the 40s. These medical officials essentially sentenced innocent men to slow, horrible deaths as they stood idly by and watched.

But that started in the 1930s. The real boom in experiments against the population didn’t begin until World War II, when the military not only began testing truth serum and other chemical agents against its own soldiers, but the military sailed ships up the California coastline spraying bacteria on coastal towns to see how far it would spread. Some died of pneumonia. After the war ended, and the country was swathed in the national security blanket, and unwitting citizens including soldiers, prisoners, terminal cancer patients, and even children, were subjected to all manner of experiments from radiation injections to mind control.

And, considering the level of corruption that has spread across this nation’s leadership like a cancer, there is no real reason to believe secret experimentation against the people ever stopped.

The book “The Plutonium Files” specifically outlines the government’s cold war medical experimentation (or, what has come out on record since then anyway), which included injecting cancer patients and the terminally ill, including a 10-year-old boy who died days later, with high doses of radiation. It’s a pretty hard read.

One story that has really stuck with me (even though it is far from the worst) discloses how boys at a known eugenics school in Massachusetts were fed radiation-laced oatmeal by MIT scientists under the ruse that they were chosen to be part of a special club. Their parents were even sent letters which made this violation of human rights sound like a good and even healthy thing for these kids, stating the study was, “in connection with the nutrition department of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology” with “the purpose of helping to improve the nutrition of our children.” It went on to say the boys would get, “a quart of milk daily… taken to a baseball game, to the beach, and to some outside dinners” and “enjoy it greatly,” all with zero mention that the government, via the Atomic Energy Commission, had signed off on turning their kids into human guinea pigs.

Seventy four children between 1946 and 1953 were fed this radioactive concoction. “You had to drink the milk. That was the thing,” one victim named Gordon remembered. The scientists would force the kids to clean their bowls, every last bit. They were allowed to ask for seconds. Guess it beat whatever the other kids at that awful place were being fed at the time.

The thing is, it wasn’t even for any real purposeful research.

These kinds of top secret experiments went on for decades without the public’s knowledge. After World War II, the government even shipped over thousands of German and Japanese scientists under Operation Paperclip. Some of these individuals had been engaged in biological and chemical warfare research during the war. Most of them never faced trials for the horrid atrocities they committed against humanity.

Even today we don’t know the full scope of everything that happened as a consequence of that. There are still 600 million documents related to Operation Paperclip that have yet to be declassified. National security means we may never know. The country was put on a “need-to-know” basis when that act was signed in 1947, and we simply don’t need to know.

In 1998, MIT and Quaker Oats agreed to pay out $1.85 million to 45 victims of the radioactive oatmeal study; Massachusetts was forced to pay another $676,000 to 27 participants. The book says some federal and state lawsuits on this matter are still pending.

The question is, if they would do this… if they would feed radioactive oatmeal to helpless children and lie to them and their parents about it for years… well gee, is there anything they wouldn’t do?

And what other experiments have been done on the public without its knowledge or consent? It seems the government only informs when it is forced to. The rest of us are still on a need-to-know basis.

 
Button
 
 
 
You Are Here
 
You Are Here
 
 
 

You may not want to be, you may not think you are, but you are.

 
 
 
 
Start Where You Are
 
Start Where You Are
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
KGB 1960s Experiment
 
KGB 1960s Experiment
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
Why Arguing Does Not Work
 
This Is Incitement
This Is Incitement
 
 
 

I had a discussion with someone on the subject of our disagreement on US politics. They had told me in effect that Trump was bad because he incited the storming of the Capitol. I sent that person a small sample of the inflammatory remarks by four Communist US politicians regarding the Antifa/BLM rioting.

The person’s response was to suggest we not talk about politics because we have different opinions and we are each only going to pull up examples to support our own opinion.

At that point it struck me that the person had zero interest in the aquisition or acceptance of data to determine truth but only in gathering data to support their apparently fixed and unchangeable viewpoint. In other words they operated like a one man debating team rather than a data collection and evaluation processing unit. This is, of course, one resain why nobody wins an argument. All each person’s communication does is more firmly fix the other person’s viewpoint.

Opinions, viewpoints, fixed ideas and conclusions are all well and good but to use them instead of and in contradiction to data, facts and evidence is a sure path to destruction and death, individually and collectively. Evidence Western civilisation circa 2021.

The situation has deteriorated to a point where most people do not (and perhaps cannot) differentiate between facts and opinions.

 
 
 
 
Fall Seven Get Up Eight
 
Fall Seven Get Up Eight
 
 
 

If you have read the story of the life of Abraham Lincoln you would appreciate that it is not how many times you fail that is important, it is that fact that you get up and try again after each failure.

 
 
 
 
How To Buy Influence
 
How To Buy Influence
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
Do Your Best
 
Do Your Best
 
 
 

Do your best because you deserve to do the best for your own personal integrity FAR more than you need praise or approval from others!

 
 
 
 
Peruvian court rules that Bill Gates, George Soros and Rockefeller family “created” coronavirus pandemic
 
How To Buy Influence
 
 
 

Bill Gates, George Soros, and several members of the Rockefeller family were deemed responsible for the advent and spread of the Chinese virus, which has killed tens of thousands of small businesses and forever changed the world for the worst.

The Chicha and Pisco Criminal Appeals Chamber decided that the ever-dreaded Chinese germs were the product of “criminal elite around the world” – mostly multi-billionaires with global depopulation on their minds.

 
Button
 
 
 
How nanotech is changing your world
 
Nanotech
 
 
 

The American engineer Eric Drexler, who coined the term nanotechnology in the 1980s, is not afraid of ambitious thinking. In his 2013 book Radical Abundance: How a Revolution in Nanotechnology Will Change Civilization, Drexler imagines a 3D printer-like “factory in a box”, which could manipulate atoms precisely enough to manufacture almost anything.

The American engineer Eric Drexler, who coined the term nanotechnology in the 1980s, is not afraid of ambitious thinking. In his 2013 book Radical Abundance: How a Revolution in Nanotechnology Will Change Civilization, Drexler imagines a 3D printer-like “factory in a box”, which could manipulate atoms precisely enough to manufacture almost anything.

We may still be far from realizing Drexler’s vision, but the field which he named is maturing quickly. Only a few years ago, nanotech was still caricatured as the preserve of crazy scientists. According to Aymeric Sallin, chief executive officer of venture capital firm NanoDimension, that has all changed and “it is now getting traction from large corporates and institutional investors. CEOs are moving from big, established companies to nanotech enterprises”.

No-needle vaccines
Nanotech is everywhere – from the needle-less Nanopatch vaccine delivery system of Vaxxas, one of the World Economic Forum’s new crop of Technology Pioneers, to the work of the Forum’s Young Scientist community member Hele Savin on making solar panels more efficient by removing impurities in silicon. So how big is the nanotech industry?

The question makes no sense, says Sallin. “Nanotech is not an industry in itself, but an enabler across all industries. By manipulating individual atoms and molecules, you can access intermediary states of matter where nature’s physical properties have changed; this is unlocking commercial opportunities from health to manufacturing, energy to farming.”

In medicine, especially, the promise of nanotechnology has been apparent for years but is only now coming to fruition. CEO of venture capital firm Flagship Ventures, Noubar Afeyan, explains: “If we could cure diseases with human imagination alone, we’d be done by now. You can write things down, and design them, and they should work – but reality is always more complex. For example, original approaches to creating nanomedicine often underestimated the need for targeting, so they were interacting with all kinds of things in the body.”

Click the Read More button to finish the article.

 
Button
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Until next time,
dream big dreams,
plan out how to achieve them,
be continually executing your plans,
enlist people to your causes,
travel and/or read widely, preferably both,
all the while observing what you observe
rather than thinking what you are told to think,
think well of your fellow man,
take time to help your fellow man,
he sorely needs it and it will help you too,
eat food that is good for your body,
exercise your body,
take time to destress,
and do the important things
that make a difference -
they are rarely the urgent ones!

Tom

 
 

Most of the content herein has been copied from someone else. Especially the images. My goodness some people are talented at creating aesthetics! The small bits that are of my creation are Copyright 2014-2021 © by Tom Grimshaw - ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Back Issues | Feedback | Subscribe | Unsubscribe

Software Development
Festival Management Software
Healthy Snacks
How to Live The Healthiest Life